Let’s say the cost of a compliance program is $12,000 per annum. Does that sound like a lot?
The answer is contingent on what it is replacing.
If automation eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious evidence gathering in a complex technology system, $12,000 might be a wise investment. If a company of seven could collect the same information manually, in a couple of hours every month, the cost will be very different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t start by asking which platform offers the most features. Ask how much time and effort these features will save your company.
Automated Manufacturing Comes with an End-of-Even
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily good or bad. The scale of the business can affect its value. Imagine a technology firm that is growing, with several cloud environments, a variety of applications and frequent changes in access. The strain of manually gathering evidence constantly could be extremely difficult. Integrations that monitor systems automatically and collect evidence could easily justify the cost.
Consider a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2. Imagine a startup having 10 employees working on its first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based on this variation. The capabilities of a high-end platform are impressive, but they only offer financial value in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture, Not Just Brands
Searching for Vanta Vs. Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. The two platforms are built on automation and integrated companies that are looking to adopt this kind of solution can benefit by comparison of the frameworks that are supported by their integrations, as well as the service along with individual quotations and contracts.
You’ll need to make a decision on something else first. Does your company want an integration-driven platform for compliance or not? Certain companies would like constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Others would rather provide evidence by themselves, especially when the volume of work is low.
Vanta Competitors Don’t Always Follow the same model
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete in a category that is centered around automation. On the market, there are platforms with a simpler design which focus more on the organization of systems rather instead of connectivity.
CertAssist is part of the second group. CertAssist is a product developed by internal auditors, compliance consultants and other professionals, is a system for organizing controls frameworks in a central place. It provides editable policies and guidance for evidence, and allows auditors to review evidence via read-only access.
It doesn’t connect to operational systems, or create infrastructure agents. Customers upload their own documentation.
It is important to consider the system’s access.
Removal of integrations does not come without its downsides. Someone has to take the time to collect evidence.
It also removes the need for integration setup and this means that the compliance application does not require connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
Both architectures are equally excellent. The question is which choice is best for your business.
CertAssist is a solution for teams with between five and 200 people. The pricing of the service is announced rather than needing an appointment with sales representatives to find the initial figure. The starting price is $225 per month which compares to the regular price of $375 a month.
Let Complexity Be In Control
The needs of a 10-person startup today won’t necessarily be the same for a company with 100 or 500 employees.
While compliance is straightforward, a lightweight platform may make sense. As the amount of employees, systems frameworks, and evidence requirements increases, economics may eventually favor greater automation. It’s better to let the complexity of technology for compliance to earn its rightful place.
The cost of purchasing fifty integrations simply because they look attractive in a table of comparisons is not a good idea. Pay for them when manually doing the job they replace becomes the more expensive option.
